2 ms·
Lol no, some anti-science luddites repeating Exxon mobile's talking points doesn't make me wrong. I'm not oversimplifying, I'm correcting the coefficients on a
by Wyoming23 4y ago
Lol no, some anti-science luddites repeating Exxon mobile's talking points doesn't make me wrong.
I'm not oversimplifying, I'm correcting the coefficients on an equation.
Fire mitigation is such a trivially small part of this, that lay people shouldn't even be thinking about it.
Saying wild fires are natural is like saying lung cancer is natural when someone points out the risks of smoking. It doesn't go to zero if you don't smoke, but in general terms the key takeaway people should have is "smoking causes lung cancer" not "lung cancer is natural and will happen anyway regardless of if people smoke or not"
- user3939382 4y agoMaking ad hominem attacks against the people who disagree with you doesn’t strengthen your argument. MIT probably isn’t comprised of “anti-science luddites” and actually by ignoring the consensus and research on this issue you’re the one positioned against science. https://news.mit.edu/2013/forest-fire-management-1120 https://news.mit.edu/2013/forest-fire-management-1120