> (sub-replacement fertility of the most productive and the vast influx of net-negative aliens) Is there really anything more to this comment than "white child

> (sub-replacement fertility of the most productive and the vast influx of net-negative aliens) Is there really anything more to this comment than "white children good; brown children bad"? Every study I've ever seen on the effects of immigration conclude that immigration (at the levels seen in Europe and UK) is extremely healthy and that immigrants are "net-positive" (to use your heavily judgy wording) in almost every sense.