8 ms·
I assume yours is an off-the-cuff take here, but more than 1% of people wearing masks thought they were at least somewhat effective at reducing spread, and not
by zamfi 4y ago
I assume yours is an off-the-cuff take here, but more than 1% of people wearing masks thought they were at least somewhat effective at reducing spread, and not just a shibboleth.
- puffoflogic 4y agoSomeone thinking that the masks were somewhat effective at reducing spread, but still only wearing them because signal, is entirely consistent.
- zamfi 4y agoSure, so I'll spell it out for you: More than 1% of people wore masks because they thought it would have an effect, not "only wearing them because signal".