3 ms·
I don't think the analysis went far enough. Consider this: What happens if you don't walk enough to maintain your health, say, heart health? What's the CO2 fo
by gardenfelder 4y ago
I don't think the analysis went far enough. Consider this:
What happens if you don't walk enough to maintain your health, say, heart health? What's the CO2 footprint of all the imaginable health interventions you might need?
Seems to me the linked analysis is far too weak to be of much value.
- deleted 4y ago[deleted]
- JohnFen 4y ago> Seems to me the linked analysis is far too weak to be of much value. That's putting it far too mildly.
- guidoism 4y agoAnd if you walk you maintain health and live longer which means you are making even worse for the environment. Cars mean dying earlier which is better. Unsafe cars are even better. We should get rid of seatbelts and bollards. /snark
- Viliam1234 4y ago> What happens if you don't walk enough to maintain your health, say, heart health? An ambulance will drive you to the hospital, don't worry, it is a very ecological thing. A burial in a wooden coffin will remove further carbon from the atmosphere. It's the people who go to the gym after work, and inefficiently burn calories there, who are the true monsters destroying the environment.