> if MSFT made IE a necessary component to upgrade the operating system, > then insisting the OS Arguing that a change that had no technical merit made IE nec

> if MSFT made IE a necessary component to upgrade the operating system, > then insisting the OS Arguing that a change that had no technical merit made IE necessary, when you are under scrunity for abusing your market position to push IE, seems kinda counterproductive. > I said it vindicating their decision- not that IE was a good foundation to build a presentation layer on. Then how does chrome OS vindicate them? You obviously agree that IE was not fit for that purpose.