4 ms·
I have tried both uBlock Minus[0] and AdguardMV3[1] and can confidently say that they're barely a shadow of their manifest-v2 versions. [0] https://github.com
by Raed667 4y ago
I have tried both uBlock Minus[0] and AdguardMV3[1] and can confidently say that they're barely a shadow of their manifest-v2 versions.
[0] https://github.com/gorhill/uBlock/tree/master/platform/mv3 https://github.com/gorhill/uBlock/tree/master/platform/mv3
[1] https://github.com/AdguardTeam/AdGuardMV3 https://github.com/AdguardTeam/AdGuardMV3
- Vinnl 4y agoI'm not familiar with Adguard, but uBO Minus is meant to be a shadow of regular uBO, because it tries not to request page permissions for every website by default. Presumably, an actual MV3 version will do that and use that to at least fall back to visual blocking if request blocking is not possible.
- Raed667 4y agoYou can easily tweak the manifest.json to grant the extension permissions on all urls. Give it a shot and see that it still falls behind and doesn't block much of the annoyances.
- Vinnl 4y agoYeah but just granting it doesn't make it actually make use of it, no? Or are you referring to the recent update where it allows you to give permission on a per-website basis where it will do more blocking? If so, then I believe you and then it's worse than I thought.
- Raed667 4y agoYou don't have to believe me, you can try my fork pre-built here https://github.com/raed667/uBlock-minus-mv3-cs-poc/releases/tag/host_permissions https://github.com/raed667/uBlock-minus-mv3-cs-poc/releases/...