4 ms·
"The point is, Lush has datatypes for fast numerics: it’s designed to do fast numerics. Clojure doesn’t have such datatypes..." He knows he's not comparing lik
by lutorm 15y ago
"The point is, Lush has datatypes for fast numerics: it’s designed to do fast numerics. Clojure doesn’t have such datatypes..."
He knows he's not comparing like for like. What he apparently doesn't know is that there is a better data type.
- Nrsolis 15y agoWhats the better datatype? I'm looking at doing some numeric programming and I wondered about Clojure for this.
- weavejester 15y agoIf your aim is raw speed, not a lot beats a standard JVM array.