Yes, but it is a lot cleaner there because you don't need to specify the name of the type and you don't need to do anything special for optional arguments. I w

Yes, but it is a lot cleaner there because you don't need to specify the name of the type and you don't need to do anything special for optional arguments. I wouldn't mind if it worked this way "under the hood" but syntax sugar for passing that last argument as keyword arguments would be a fantastic quality of life improvement.