4 ms·
The title of this post is annoying: Typically we say "faster broadband", when we talk about bandwidth, not about "speed" (which would be latency). So obviously,
by preya2k 4y ago
The title of this post is annoying: Typically we say "faster broadband", when we talk about bandwidth, not about "speed" (which would be latency). So obviously, as long as your website is not larger than your bandwidth capacity, nothing is gonna get "faster", when you upgrade your broadband bandwidth.
This is the same as saying "Despite larger pipes every year, water still doesn't reach your house any faster".
- xuki 4y agoBandwidth = data per unit of time. So for the same amount of data, faster bandwidth absolutely decreases load time.
- dredmorbius 4y agoExpanding on this point: If a website is transferring more data to render content, or worse, before starting to display content, then bandwidth matters as it will move that data more quickly. If a website requires multiple round trips to complete a given request, then latency will also matter, and sets an absolute minimum floor to time-to-display (TTD) regardless of bandwidth. The higher your latency, the slower that process. In theory it's possible for an SPA (single-page application) to be more responsive despite an overall larger page weight as it can incrementally request and present additional content. In practice such pages often perform worse on time to display due to both increased total data transfer and round-trip request requirements. A lightweight HTTP/2 HTML+CSS only site can be far more performant if it's based on static pages and request/load dynamics.