4 ms·
Claims to go for data, then throws away all modern advice (which some of it should indeed be looked at critically if the data is corrcect but is based on data)
by jiggywiggy 4y ago
Claims to go for data, then throws away all modern advice (which some of it should indeed be looked at critically if the data is corrcect but is based on data) and then argues for optimizing vitamins & minerals, without any backing of real data. Optimum vitamin doses, balance & requirements are poorly understood. (deficiencies are easier to understand).
- Kaibeezy 4y agoIf the shark has been jumped, it’s here: What if we have innate cravings for ALL of the essential nutrients, and what if we keep eating until we get enough of them? Hence, rather than avoiding bad things in food, the ultimate quest in the nutrition space should be to understand what foods we need to prioritise to get the nutrients we need to be satiated and thrive! That’s definitely an overreach. Here’s how I might have put it: What if we have a sense of “craving” for a broad-based and long-term level of adequate nutrients, and what if we tend to keep eating towards that general goal? [the subsequent paragraph, minus the exclamation point]