2 ms·
Which is more ad hominem - I only judged the author by what they wrote. Pointing out they’re a professor sounds more like we need to trust them because of who t
by ramraj07 4y ago
Which is more ad hominem - I only judged the author by what they wrote. Pointing out they’re a professor sounds more like we need to trust them because of who they are.
one could say his career depends on selling this idea that these exoplanets are awesome sauce. Maybe it’s even worse?
- pc86 4y agoI imagine in career depends much more on his peer-reviewed publications and teaching (almost certainly in that order) than on this blog post or one of his presumably many theories. > Either the “astronomer” author wasn’t a real astronomer at all or this is just clickbait. Well it turns out he is a real astronomer, and doesn't appear to be a "hack" either as you also said he was.
- ramraj07 4y agoSo he is an astronomer, thus just merely disengenous. I suppose that’s more comforting to you?