It's not clear that the non sequitur is the fault of Gonzales. It is true that the history of elite universities is highly related to exclusion, as she said. O

It's not clear that the non sequitur is the fault of Gonzales. It is true that the history of elite universities is highly related to exclusion, as she said. One clear as day example: the historical exclusion of Jews. It's easy to find others. The article says: "For instance, many institutions have a history of seizing land from Indigenous groups, or originally derived their wealth from or supported their infrastructure with the labour of enslaved Black people." But did Gonzales give those examples? Even a friend to her argument would probably agree that exclusion in the admissions context of elite schools would be more relevant.