3 ms·
>Obviously. Apparently not, as you insist on only a single value in your own post. > The number I suggested is 1) an upper limit not a lower limit How is tha
by nautilius 4y ago
>Obviously.
Apparently not, as you insist on only a single value in your own post.
> The number I suggested is 1) an upper limit not a lower limit
How is that related to anything? Did you consider going even faster in rain and snow?