3 ms·
Who cares that it’s legal though? You’re on their property, committed to abiding by their terms of service even. If you’re hosting a garden party and one of th
by nrb 4y ago
Who cares that it’s legal though? You’re on their property, committed to abiding by their terms of service even.
If you’re hosting a garden party and one of the guests has become disruptive to everyone else, are you not allowed to demand they cease their behavior or leave your property just because their angry ranting is not illegal speech?
You’re totally within your right to say “I’m out, this party sucks anyway, you guys don’t want to have honest debate” but it’s a little absurd to force the property owner to allow you to stick around when you are no longer welcome.
- pessimizer 4y agoDo you feel the same way about telephones? How about electricity? Is it out of the realm of possibility that a conscientious electrical supplier might not want to power a racist's computer?
- nrb 4y agoElectricity is analogous to the the road that you traveled on to the way to the party. > Is it out of the realm of possibility that a conscientious electrical supplier might not want to power a racist's computer? Isn’t this the case that these same people are making for why ISPs should NOT be neutral, even though they’re much more like electricity and roads than private garden parties?
- honkler 4y ago
- cowtools 4y agoIf you don't like it, just build your own state. smh.
- epakai 4y agoThis is a first amendment violation. It should be obvious how the state differs from corporate entities or persons.
- ladyattis 4y agoActually, Florida doesn't own the property of the private citizens whether its the network fiber, routers, or buildings which contain these items. If you can't justify such a capricious law then maybe your intention is malicious?