4 ms·

What's hilarious is that jasonpeacock didn't just avoid reading the article, but it's clear that he also avoided reading the very comment he replied to. It's l

• tsimionescu 4y ago
  And not once, but twice! Even though it's a lot of fun, it's honestly a bit eye opening to see how little some people engage with the substance of the comments they are replying to...
  • jasonpeacock 4y ago
    ok, jokes on me :) I did the read the article (and have bought both books). but I've seen so much garbage about CICO that I took the response seriously..
    • tsimionescu 4y ago
      Yes, I've been there once or twice myself, no judgment on you personally! The amount of people responding this way was a bit surprising though. I will note that I completely share your feelings about the boring version of CICO.
    • elil17 4y ago
      To be clear I agree with you. I find “CICO” a totally dissatisfying explanation of obesity, not because I don’t think it’s true, but rather because I think it fails to provide any insight that’s actionable from a public health perspective.
    • Nition 4y ago
      Go back and read the original response again. It doesn't say anything about calories out.