3 ms·
These claims sound pretty suspect and much more selective journals than iScience have published completely bogus research before. Would like to see this replic
by Jweb_Guru 4y ago
These claims sound pretty suspect and much more selective journals than iScience have published completely bogus research before. Would like to see this replicated many, many times before anyone starts selling a product whose purported benefits are demonstrated solely from a single research study from a highly conflicted author.
- pessimizer 4y ago> much more selective journals than iScience have published completely bogus research before. Do you post this under every journal article? Reminding everyone that things have been false before in places?
- deleted 4y ago[deleted]
- Jweb_Guru 4y agoNot every article. I just find it quite amusing that HN rails against the replication crisis, but when a clearly fishy publication that comports to its iases gets to the front page suddenly it's not an issue.