3 ms·
Yeah, that's definitely the case and I see where the hassle is, but to restate my point, those costs are simply a part of overhead and not the business of users
by prego_xo 4y ago
Yeah, that's definitely the case and I see where the hassle is, but to restate my point, those costs are simply a part of overhead and not the business of users. Unless the users are given an opt-out first and foremost, they're owed ownership over their personal data.
- legitster 4y agoAgain, the language of the proposed bill is requiring 2 free requests per person. $100 for an occasional person? No biggie. Potentially infinite? That's a bit more than normal overhead. While we haven't seen this sort of DDoS attack through our GDPR process yet, the potential is already there if bad actors or competitors wanted to exploit it.