I think calling it meaningless drivel is a bit much, but you are right that we should be careful drawing inferences. It's "at the very least" worth considering

I think calling it meaningless drivel is a bit much, but you are right that we should be careful drawing inferences. It's "at the very least" worth considering: What does it mean that under specific circumstances we can be so sure of ourselves about such basic stuff and so totally wrong at the same time? It might not be a strong inference from split-brain phenomena, but it'd be a shame to /not/ wonder about whether and how much such confabulatory mechanisms are at play in normal functioning brains, then