The real problem as I see it is that people think the path to safe C++ is to tell everyone "you're holding it wrong" (just use modern C++), when it fact being a

The real problem as I see it is that people think the path to safe C++ is to tell everyone "you're holding it wrong" (just use modern C++), when it fact being able to hold it wrong is regarded as a feature (C++ maintains backward compatibility) by the C++ community.