2 ms·
> For 2, you can't find what isn't there, so something random would come out. It's not a search engine. It can synthesise things that it hasn't seen to some de
by andybak 4y ago
> For 2, you can't find what isn't there, so something random would come out.
It's not a search engine. It can synthesise things that it hasn't seen to some degree (assuming it knows the elements that make up the request.
The tricky bit would to teach it "Gettyness" without showing it Getty images but I think that's entirely possible. Getty images aren't astonishing examples of unprecedented originality. So it just needs to know a) the celebrity b) the action and c) what people mean when they ask for something that looks like a Getty image.
EDIT - I answered in a rush and realise you made a similar point to me about "Gettyness" - which makes it even harder for me to understand why you think it would be a violation.
How many different ways can George Clooney eat a burrito in Times Square?
- not2b 4y agoSuppose that there's a really iconic pic of George Clooney eating a burrito in Times Square, with a "Getty Images" watermark on it, in the training set. It's perfectly framed, has a somewhat comic expression, and a bit of the contents spilled on his shirt. It seems quite possible that the model could produce an image that isn't identical to this but so much so that people assume it's a copy, maybe produced by an artist based on the picture. Worse, it will have most of the "Getty Images" watermark right on the image. If that doesn't convince you that there might be an issue I'll just stop here.