You know you're relying on Sweden's council for crime prevention to provide an argument that Sweden's council for crime prevention is doing a good job at handli

You know you're relying on Sweden's council for crime prevention to provide an argument that Sweden's council for crime prevention is doing a good job at handling crime - right? The thing you excerpted doesn't even make sense. Let's write <country's method of rape count>-<country being evaluated> - so, S-S is Sweden's measures of Sweden's rape count, and G-S is Germany's measure of Sweden's rape count. What this article is saying is that S-S is by far the highest rape count in Europe. G-S is significantly higher than G-G. But, if you were to go through all the countries of Europe, and find E-E then G-S would be somewhere in the middle. What? What kind of a methodology is this? How would Sweden rank if you took G-E for every country in Europe? "Sure, we're a global leader in bombings. Yes, we're a regional leader in shooting murders. Yes, we're a regional leader in humiliation robberies targeting our children. And, yes, if you look at our official statistics we seem to be the regional leader in rapes as well - but this is a right-wing conspiracy because of this nonsense analysis!"