CEOs tend to be compensated in ways that make them more than mere wage laborers so our intersection of agreement is likely much higher, yes. We can also acknowl

CEOs tend to be compensated in ways that make them more than mere wage laborers so our intersection of agreement is likely much higher, yes. We can also acknowledge that stock-based compensation[RSUs], ESPP, and even 401k's(in certain, yet extremely prevalent configurations) also hybridize a fair share of workers who at the same time are income-funded through wage labor. While this makes some workers not neatly classifiable into one or the other bucket, I don't believe it necessarily invalidates the argument. We can, without even drawing a line, agree that such a line exist somewhere between the two extremes and proceed from there.