4 ms·
I must be a Scheme "snot", because the definition of "lambda" in C++ (and other languages) is not semantically what lambda in Scheme is. (There's a different d
by jjtheblunt 4y ago
I must be a Scheme "snot", because the definition of "lambda" in C++ (and other languages) is not semantically what lambda in Scheme is.
(There's a different definition of closure than in Scheme, with different implications as a result.)
- ncmncm 4y agoC++ lambda is particularly adapted to the needs of C++, and C++ programmers. It would be very surprising if it matched any Lisp's. Lisps differ from one another, too.