3 ms·
Or it's cleverly done so everyone has plausible deniability, when in reality everyone involved knew it was basically election interference and first amendment v
by cloutchaser 4y ago
Or it's cleverly done so everyone has plausible deniability, when in reality everyone involved knew it was basically election interference and first amendment violation. It doesn't take an IQ of 200 to do that without leaving direct evidence.
- darawk 4y agoYa, that's a real possibility, and some of these cases will probably turn on the judge's perception of whether that is what was happening. It seems very hard to prove in a case like that one though.