>you stated that the Daily Sceptic specifically - the site this thread is about - had been "directing and encouraging harassment and violent threats against doc

>you stated that the Daily Sceptic specifically - the site this thread is about - had been "directing and encouraging harassment and violent threats against doctors". No, what I said was that was what you were suggested, because you literally raised the Tavistock issue and I looked it up and found out a load of people are threatening doctors. Apparently that's not what you meant, but it's not my fault you aren't being specific. I don't think it's an unreasonable jump for me to look at what you cited and go "Oh yeah you're right, the death threats against doctors are a bad thing". I told you, I don't read the website, I'm not going to trawling through it. It looks like it's full of terrible dross, which is why I deferred to your explanation. Personally, I could imagine it being any of a thousand other things. But that's life, if you fill your website full of absolute rubbish you're going to have trouble figuring out whats objectionable.