3 ms·
Proof that we are in a simulation, not all details are accurately or correctly simulated. /sarcasm
by jjkaczor 4y ago
Proof that we are in a simulation, not all details are accurately or correctly simulated.
/sarcasm
- lioeters 4y agoThe fact that things are not perfect or correct seems to me like an argument that it's not a simulation. In other words, I'd be suspicious if things are too "perfect" from our primitive primate intelligence.
- kaptainscarlet 4y agoIt's just a simulation with geometry, physics, detailed textures and ray tracing.
- ralala 4y agoI think we also have lazy evaluation, heuristics (wave-particle duality), out-of-memory killers (black holes, hawking radiation) and bandwidth limitations (speed of light). It seems obvious, hopefully it's not going to kernel panic!
- CoastalCoder 4y agoWell if that's true, then who created Jensen Huang?
- nvahalik 4y agoOr, as many people since ancient times have believed, that we live in a universe created ex nihilo by a being capable of doing so…
- coldacid 4y agoWhich very well could be a simulation on some god's computer :^)