> The data is obviously highly biased but when you look at top researchers, what % went to CC vs what % to top undergraduate programs? Right, it is biased. You

> The data is obviously highly biased but when you look at top researchers, what % went to CC vs what % to top undergraduate programs? Right, it is biased. You need a control - two similar people with similar backgrounds. People going to CC are usually not doing so by choice. I think that ultimately, some people are going to be successful regardless of the path they take. Universities attempt to capture the recognition for where their attendees end up, but I think that has more to do with the attendees than the universities.