3 ms·
> Even if the withdrawal itself was legal (the person who withdrew the money was not a US person), the government could argue that he should have known the fund
by prvit 4y ago
> Even if the withdrawal itself was legal (the person who withdrew the money was not a US person), the government could argue that he should have known the funds could have came from some crime, i.e:
I think you’re misreading that. The Government has to prove that the defendant knew that the property was criminally derived, but the government does not have to prove that the defendant was aware of the list of specific unlawful activities.
- from 4y agoYou’re right I misread that. I still think an overzealous prosecutor could find some violation, especially if p2p exchanges are used. They have charged people with operating an unlicensed money transmitter for merely being a customer of an unlicensed money transmitter!