4 ms·
I feel "partial" in 'partial mobilization' intends to be deceptive. The version of the decree released to the public [1] contains nothing limiting number of rec
by mzarate06 4y ago
I feel "partial" in 'partial mobilization' intends to be deceptive. The version of the decree released to the public [1] contains nothing limiting number of recruits. That number is specified in a classified portion of the decree [2]. If it simply stated the same number Putin and Shoigu claim (300k), I doubt it would need to be classified.
Sounds like they're masking this as "partial" mobilization in the same way they've masked their war as a "special military operation."
[1] May need to open in reader: https://www.politico.eu/article/text-vladimir-putin-mobilization-decree-war-ukraine-russia/ https://www.politico.eu/article/text-vladimir-putin-mobiliza...
[2] https://tass.com/politics/1511291 https://tass.com/politics/1511291
- jakzurr 4y agoThose are pretty good points, thanks.
- mzarate06 4y agoAnd just hours later, we're starting to see reports claiming exactly this: "Hidden paragraph of Putin's decree allows to mobilise 1 million Russians". Granted, that's a Ukrainian news article, but I won't be surprised if the true scope of Putin's claimed "partial" mobilization ends up being far more than they're masking it as. [1]https://www.pravda.com.ua/eng/news/2022/09/22/7368607/ https://www.pravda.com.ua/eng/news/2022/09/22/7368607/
- listic 4y agoNon-Ukrainian news article: https://novayagazeta.eu/articles/2022/09/22/istochnik-zasekrechennyi-punkt-ukaza-o-mobilizatsii-pozvoliaet-minoborony-prizvat-odin-million-chelovek-news https://novayagazeta.eu/articles/2022/09/22/istochnik-zasekr...