6 ms·
For those with better understanding of where zig is at, why not zig for kernel development? Is it merely because it's still in heavy dev?
by oxplot 4y ago
For those with better understanding of where zig is at, why not zig for kernel development? Is it merely because it's still in heavy dev?
- mlindner 4y agoI think the answer to your question is also the answer to the question of how Zig achieves memory safety at compile time.
- Jensson 4y agoYeah, Rust is C with a sane version of C++'s RAI, Zig is C with a sane version of C++'s templates. Having Turing complete duck typed template metaprogramming is very fun and useful, but I understand why you wouldn't want that in huge security critical codebases.