Then you misunderstood. The same you’d rank a person’s work, you would rank a team or org’s work. If that team is doing really well, it’s likely they will hav

Then you misunderstood. The same you’d rank a person’s work, you would rank a team or org’s work. If that team is doing really well, it’s likely they will have a distribution of higher rankings than the average. If they’re doing really bad, it can be the opposite. The point is that if you finished ranking some team and your rankings are higher than average, you need to have a reason why. What makes a ranking into a stack ranking?