3 ms·
For what it's worth, Twitter has gone back and forth on this. They did serve useful HTML up-front in the recent past. It was faster for initial delivery and I'd
by wubsitesgood 4y ago
For what it's worth, Twitter has gone back and forth on this. They did serve useful HTML up-front in the recent past. It was faster for initial delivery and I'd imagine helped the odd person who was sent a link to a tweet and hadn't loaded the site in a while.
Other sites in the article fit a traditional website model where folks commonly land on pages from search results, but they're still very JS dependent for content. CNN and FedEx etc