You implicitly take a side by shutting down discussion that criticizes western indological research under the pre-tense of "I... recognize the pattern when I se

You implicitly take a side by shutting down discussion that criticizes western indological research under the pre-tense of "I... recognize the pattern when I see it." This may be controversial, but if you don't let others voice their views, then you let the predominating opinion retain its influence. I recognize moderation is required but I was genuinely engaging with someone's viewpoint curiously. It is not frequent you come across someone here that is conversant with tattvavAda philosophy of MadhvacArya - doesn't seem acceptable to shut them down, especially given the history of colonial influence in India and throughout the world. These countries are finally now finding their voice after centuries of occupation, and it seems quite harsh to shut down that down on the basis of flamewars. Ultimately you probably have more experience on this topic so will ultimately defer to your judgement and authority but wanted to share another POV.