I lost all faith in the article at the mention of the embodiment of class-struggle in Bolshevism. Perhaps the author meant to synecdoche one by the other, but t

I lost all faith in the article at the mention of the embodiment of class-struggle in Bolshevism. Perhaps the author meant to synecdoche one by the other, but the lack of clarity ultimately left me disinterested in believing the author had any more lucidity in anything else. Taking the author at face value, then what of the Mensheviks, S.R.s? To go on further and to find justification in Nietzsche is absurd. I could just as easily drag Jonas Čeika into the conversation and point to evidence that Marx and Nietzsche complement each other. Given that the author doesn't even attempt to rebut such a connection, I can't help but think they are vastly under-read in this area and as such simply wrote whatever drivel they wanted without actually engaging in the topic. At the end of the day he's engaging in a classic trope of reality construction by invoking common sense and truth. His brand of reality has its own unsaid boundaries - simply identify ideas that he would claim as heresy and the worldview he holds will be outlined as the very ideological reality he claims to dispute.