4 ms·
java might run at a decent speed... Might, but probably won't (jk, sorry, I couldn't help myself...) [edit Grammarly decided to remove some text when fixing spe
by tiernano 4y ago
java might run at a decent speed... Might, but probably won't (jk, sorry, I couldn't help myself...) [edit Grammarly decided to remove some text when fixing spelling...]
- invisiblerobot 4y agoJava runs at 90% the speed of C for most common benchmarks. It uses 50x the RAM to do so. But you're dead wrong to think java is slow. The only reason physics game engines are written in C++ is because physics game engines are written in C++.
- solomatov 4y ago>Java runs at 90% the speed of C for most common benchmarks. It's not 90%, more of several times slower: https://benchmarksgame-team.pages.debian.net/benchmarksgame/fastest/gpp-java.html https://benchmarksgame-team.pages.debian.net/benchmarksgame/... >The only reason physics game engines are written in C++ is because physics game engines are written in C++. They are written in C++ because of latency requirements which are nearly impossible in GCed language.
- seer-zig 4y agoFrom what I know, the major C++ engines (Unity, Unreal) have GC in them. Using GC does not automatically mean that latency is out the window.
- deleted 4y ago[deleted]
- tiernano 4y agoYou missed the jk (joking part) didn't you. Only Java apps I use are jdownloader and ikvm apps for servers...and well, they are slow...
- throwaway019254 4y agoHave you ever used any service from AWS? Then you were using Java.