4 ms·
Yes, it should fit with WunderBase to provide HA. I'm adding S3 support which will work the same (in principle) as Litestream. I'm hoping to have that in about
by benbjohnson 4y ago
Yes, it should fit with WunderBase to provide HA. I'm adding S3 support which will work the same (in principle) as Litestream. I'm hoping to have that in about a month or so.
- rsync 4y agoCan you comment on how you added SFTP support to litestream so that it would work with rsync.net[1][2] ? How does that compare/contrast with what my grandparent is alluding to ? [1] https://github.com/benbjohnson/litestream/issues/140 https://github.com/benbjohnson/litestream/issues/140 [2] https://www.rsync.net/resources/notes/2021-q3-rsync.net_technotes.html https://www.rsync.net/resources/notes/2021-q3-rsync.net_tech...
- benbjohnson 4y agoLitestream does log shipping so it just takes a chunk of the write-ahead log (WAL) and copies it out a destination. That can be S3, GCP, SFTP, etc. LiteFS will do the same although I'm only targeting S3 initially. That seemed to be the bulk of what people used.
- rsync 4y agoOK, thank you. As with the litestream component, it would be wonderful to have an SFTP transport for LiteFS. When you say 'S3' I assume you mean "S3 compatible API" so that would be fairly open and portable but SFTP would be even more so. Thanks again.