3 ms·
> For the posterity of this thread American banks are no longer required to hold any reserve requirements at all[1]. That is misleading. Banks are no longer re
by jcranmer 4y ago
> For the posterity of this thread American banks are no longer required to hold any reserve requirements at all[1].
That is misleading. Banks are no longer required to hold a certain fraction of their deposits in their bank account at a Federal Reserve bank--that's the reserve requirement that was reduced to 0%. Keep in mind that only money in the bank account qualifies as reserves that requirement; a literal pile of dollar bills would contribute not one cent.
Instead, banks are required to keep on hand sufficient equity for a percentage of their risk-weighted assets--money that, if the assets go to 0, can be raided to make up the losses. The requirement here starts at I believe 8%, and increases if you're a more important bank.
(If I'm computing it correctly, Tether has disclosed a capital ratio of approximately 0%, FWIW. Were Tether actually held to the same standards as a bank, Tether would be considered dangerously undercapitalized if not outright insolvent.)
- Grimburger 4y ago> are required to keep on hand sufficient equity for a percentage of their risk-weighted assets Define "sufficient", give it an actual number... > Tether has disclosed a capital ratio of approximately 0% NYAG accounted for 90% of their assets with that big case last year didn't they?
- tptacek 4y agoYou didn't say "banks are no longer required to keep sufficient reserves". You said they were no longer required to keep reserves at all.