3 ms·
It's worth pointing out that the problem, in this scenario, is for the creator (ie, the human running the algorithm). They will need to determine whether a piec
by tobyjsullivan 4y ago
It's worth pointing out that the problem, in this scenario, is for the creator (ie, the human running the algorithm). They will need to determine whether a piece might violate copyright before using it or selling it. That seems like a very hard problem, and could be the justification for more [new] blanket rules on the AI process.
- Retric 4y agoProving artwork you created is free from all copyright issues is similarly impossible, but in practice isn’t an issue. So, I don’t see any AI specific justification being relevant.
- mr_toad 4y agoHow common is it for an artist to accidentally generate a work that resembles an existing work?
- Morgawr 4y agoI can't speak for digital art because I'm not an artist but I can say it's extremely common for original music to (often accidentally/subconsciously) include melodies or pieces of melodies from other music.
- sojournerc 4y agoThat's more like two paintings sharing the same color scheme or using the same brand+color of paint but still being unique. The performance of those melodies and structures is what makes a song unique and creative.
- zarzavat 4y agoAdam Neely the YouTuber has produced several videos about recent legal cases where musicians sue because of some superficial similarities. In most cases the higher courts in the US recognize that copying is part of the normal creative process and is not infringement unless it is a blatant rip-off.