5 ms·
So, where is the line? Diffusion models, Midjourney: not accepted. Okay that was the easy part. What if I use a AI-powered sharpening tool like Sharpen AI? Te
by can16358p 4y ago
So, where is the line?
Diffusion models, Midjourney: not accepted. Okay that was the easy part.
What if I use a AI-powered sharpening tool like Sharpen AI? Technically it's adding "AI generation" to it. What about Photoshop neural filters? What if I just extend/"touch" an image using DALL-E or Midjourney and still have the original image but with slight additions?
Probably what they mean is "majorly created with AI" but still then how is "majorly" defined then?
- squeaky-clean 4y agoYeah I'm curious too. My first thought was the recent post of the Blender3d plugin for using StableDiffusion to generate textures. If you made an elaborate 3d render, but most of your textures were AI generated, is that excluded? The wording suggests it would be banned, but it's not detailed enough to be sure.
- lbotos 4y agoThey are hedging their bets. Effectively the only time this will get resolved is if someone takes an AI artist to court for alleged infringement. Then and only then will the law be clarified wrt AI art. Until then, Getty is betting their business on the parts of copyright law they know well to reduce risk.
- adultSwim 4y agoIt's not just splitting hairs either. Training datasets also come into play with tools like resolution upscalers.