> All of those would be great things to point out for context, but this article chose only one number to use 13 or 14 vs 16 years isn't all that different, and

> All of those would be great things to point out for context, but this article chose only one number to use 13 or 14 vs 16 years isn't all that different, and most people understand absolute numbers better, so if you have to use one it seems like a good choice and isn't misleading with statistics, as the OP implies.