4 ms·
Less than the 4090 at 300 W Which confuses me, is this one of the 4080 chips with a lot of memory?
by banana_giraffe 4y ago
Less than the 4090 at 300 W
Which confuses me, is this one of the 4080 chips with a lot of memory?
- adrian_b 4y agoNo, on the contrary, it is the fully enabled chip used in 4090, with all the 18k shaders a.k.a. CUDA cores available. In RTX 4090, 2k of the 18k are disabled, so only 16k are available. In RTX 6000, presumably both the clock frequency and the supply voltage are lower, for better reliability, and that lowers the power consumption from 450 W to 300 W.
- dotnet00 4y agoIt's probably the same as a 4090 chip, but a higher quality bin such that it's more efficient than the ones binned for 4090s.
- nottorp 4y agoOuch. So extrapolating, they could do a 75W no extra power 4050 hypothetically. If they cared to bin their parts. But instead it will be 130 W.