I can accept that more 'poor people' might make use of euthanasia than 'rich people' by whatever metric you choose to define those terms. Poorer people tend to

I can accept that more 'poor people' might make use of euthanasia than 'rich people' by whatever metric you choose to define those terms. Poorer people tend to have worse health overall for various reasons, also there are a lot more of them. But the main issue I have with the headline is that Canada is not specifically euthanising the poor in the way that is implied. The statistical differences are clearly an emergence of many complex effects and situations, so to imply otherwise is inflamatory and pretty much text book hyperbole.