3 ms·
> paying for software is sometimes cheaper than "free" software Note that the original meaning of the term "Free Software" refers to liberty, not price: https:
by bheadmaster 4y ago
> paying for software is sometimes cheaper than "free" software
Note that the original meaning of the term "Free Software" refers to liberty, not price: https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/free-sw.en.html https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/free-sw.en.html
- GnarfGnarf 4y agoCan you show me an example of "free"-as-in-liberty software, that the creator(s) nevertheless charge(s) money for?
- cercatrova 4y agoAnything that is dual licensed GPL or AGPL along with a commercial license.
- marcus0x62 4y agoCygnus was the canonical example for a long time - they heavily contributed to the GNU developer tool chain in the 90’s and made money selling support contracts to corporate users.
- bheadmaster 4y agoQt uses a double-licensing model - they provide their software with GPL license (which requires all derivative software to also be GPL), while selling commercial license for money (which allows derivative software to be proprietary).
- ksherlock 4y agoThe FSF used to sell tapes (and later CDs) of GCC and Emacs. I'm sure that revenue stream has dried up in recent years but it was a money maker in the 80s.
- latexr 4y agoTextual¹ is open-source but sells the precompiled app. Keka² has the app available for free on GitHub but charges for it on the Mac App Store, to support development. ¹ IRC client for macOS: https://github.com/Codeux-Software/Textual https://github.com/Codeux-Software/Textual ² Un/archiver for macOS: https://github.com/aonez/Keka https://github.com/aonez/Keka