3 ms·
You could model that with one function taking that dependency and returning a new one with it included. Then you just use the one that has it included instead o
by Akronymus 4y ago
You could model that with one function taking that dependency and returning a new one with it included. Then you just use the one that has it included instead of the one that doesn't.
- jcparkyn 4y agoYou still have to construct and pass in that dependency though, along with all of its dependencies, recursively.