3 ms·
This article specifically targets an AMD-SP (Secure Processor); would you consider that a "secure element"? Also, from the article: "The AMD Ryzen 5 2600 is eq
by Rygian 4y ago
This article specifically targets an AMD-SP (Secure Processor); would you consider that a "secure element"?
Also, from the article: "The AMD Ryzen 5 2600 is equipped with a glued, indium-soldered nickel-plated copper heat spreader. This heat spreader shields the EM pulses and has to be disassembled, which is called delidding or decapsulation, and consists of three steps: First, the glue at the heat spreader’s border must be cut. Second, the processor and heat spreader have to be heated up to a temperature of 200°C."
If a regular CPU already contains an effective EM shield, is it fair to say it's "wide open to FI attacks"? (Or at least EMFI as discussed in this article.?)
- als0 4y ago> is it fair to say it's "wide open to FI attacks"? By FI I was referring to the broad spectrum of FI, including clock glitching, voltage perturbation, in addition to UV and EMFI.