2 ms·
I don't believe there was, my point was the statistical evidence is ambiguous at best. I should have put "smoking guns" in quotes. https://chance.amstat.org/20
by selimthegrim 4y ago
I don't believe there was, my point was the statistical evidence is ambiguous at best. I should have put "smoking guns" in quotes.
https://chance.amstat.org/2022/04/benfords-law-votes/ https://chance.amstat.org/2022/04/benfords-law-votes/
- themitigating 4y agoWhy even use smoking gun when that clearly means obvious irrefutable evidence, how do quotes help?