3 ms·
Now I understand better what you are saying, but I think your complaint is less about requiring an app, and more about the app requiring a web-service to operat
by pedalpete 4y ago
Now I understand better what you are saying, but I think your complaint is less about requiring an app, and more about the app requiring a web-service to operate.
Having said that, I think the market has spoken. This isn't an issue for most people. As you have said, most customers are not concerned about privacy, ignore if they should be or not...they aren't.
We're actually looking at privacy and communications around privacy as a selling point.
Most consumers like the idea of being able to control their devices from their phone, or just see the data which ends up in the cloud.
I understand your rant, but most people are not technically adept as you are, and want the simplicity that an app and a login give them.
The points you mention are valid, but if the majority of customers don't care, why should the company? ....to a certain extent, yes, there are the just be good to your customers, but beyond that, if the customer expects an app, as a business we need to satisfy that need.
The example that goes to your point is the smart home company that bricked everyone's house a few months ago. That was insane. But most companies are not operating like that, and don't have the level of consumer purchase commitment as the items you are describing.
- robomartin 4y ago> Having said that, I think the market has spoken. I'll disagree with you on that. This was not a decision made by consumers. It was imposed on them. The example given on another post about aquarium lights requiring an app is a perfect example of this. > most companies are not operating like that No company on earth goes into business thinking they will fail, or have to take a pivot that might be detrimental to their customers. However, this does happen. I am not talking about small insignificant events either. For example, when Apple moved from PowerPC to Intel processors they caused a lot of damage to untold numbers of customers. I remember this well because, at the time, I worked at a company that was all-in with Apple and had hundreds of machines. Every single one of those machines had to be replaced. I am sure Apple did not make that decision lightly. They had to. That's the kind of thing I am talking about.