One could argue it is _theoretically possible_ that in expectation, occasional massive breaches of hugely centralized services will actually be less damaging th

One could argue it is _theoretically possible_ that in expectation, occasional massive breaches of hugely centralized services will actually be less damaging than much more frequent but smaller scale breaches of decentralized secrets on account of the returns to better, compounding, mutually reinforcing security practices benefiting all stakeholders simultaneously It is intellectually similar to the argument that "the cloud providers might have downtime, but they're probably going to have less than your private DC due to the economies of scale and returns on investment in reliability"