4 ms·
Since some people don't believe this happened here is an overview of how the the requirement which once seemed inevitable, never happened: https://jalopnik.com
by superkuh 4y ago
Since some people don't believe this happened here is an overview of how the the requirement which once seemed inevitable, never happened:
https://jalopnik.com/self-driving-car-tech-forgotten-by-automakers-is-still-1849475361 https://jalopnik.com/self-driving-car-tech-forgotten-by-auto...
https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2017-01-12/pdf/2016-31059.pdf https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2017-01-12/pdf/2016-31059.p...
>Assuming a final rule is issued in 2019, this would mean that the phase-in period would begin in 2021, and all vehicles subject to that final rule would be required to comply in 2023.
See also, https://www.electronicdesign.com/blogs/contributed-blogs/archive/communiqu/article/21178589/electronic-design-whatever-happened-to-dsrc-and-cv2x https://www.electronicdesign.com/blogs/contributed-blogs/arc... And here's is my 2017 post on alt.cyberpunk about the ruling and a link to an articles about it back then, https://groups.google.com/g/alt.cyberpunk/c/YpRasEtoOwA https://groups.google.com/g/alt.cyberpunk/c/YpRasEtoOwA , https://freedom-to-tinker.com/2017/06/21/killing-car-privacy-by-federal-mandate/ https://freedom-to-tinker.com/2017/06/21/killing-car-privacy... and https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2017/05/danger-ahead-governments-plan-vehicle-vehicle-communication-threatens-privacy https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2017/05/danger-ahead-governmen...