5 ms·
The sitemaps standard (if this is the basis) would need to be expanded to support additional metadata / structured data to support this idea. 1. This would be
by rgrieselhuber 4y ago
The sitemaps standard (if this is the basis) would need to be expanded to support additional metadata / structured data to support this idea.
1. This would be up to sites, to your point, major question would be best way to create incentives.
2. This is solvable via a number of approaches, but the search engines themselves would be mostly responsible for finding the right approach for their business. I know how I would do it.
3. Indeed, which would be the main point of this decentralization, to let search engines focus on their hardest problem.
Edit: would Kagi not benefit from having to worry about crawling / indexing sites?
- deleted 4y ago[deleted]
- freediver 4y ago> would Kagi not benefit from having to worry about crawling / indexing sites? It would, but sitemaps do not provide that function as we discussed above. However if EU Open Web Search succeeded, that is something we could probably use to some extent.
- lexx 4y agoOr use to extend